Unasked ? Russia
There seems to be more than one “unasked question” when you look at the issue of whether or not FEMA, DHS and the new 40th Military Police Internment and Resettlement Battalion are simply preparing for a “national emergency.”
But the question really isn’t JUST about these two pieces of information. Consider WHY we are having this conversation in the first place. What is it that is driving this administration to push so quickly into a final “endgame” scenario of American citizens under martial law at all, regardless of the reason?
Do they know something that we don’t know? Seems like since last September, even the sleepiest among us should be wondering how we have gone through: 1) appropriating $9 Trillion (+/- $5 Trillion oor so depending on whatever figures you use) without anyone accounting for it; 2) appropriating a “budget larger than the military’s” for a civilian security force; and 3) putting a national healthcare plan into legislation with hardly any open discussion in the Congress at all? We have only heard that we MUST ACT NOW or else? Or else what?
You can’t tell us there is any way this additional spending (which seems to all be going to the Federal Government to pay for layers of government spending, thereby usurping the State and County legislative bodies) is going to turn around the economy. We can see it is only making things worse all the while the Federal Government seems to be talking more and more about internal threats to our country rather than external: homegrown terrorists, gun owners, vets, and now we’re supposed to believe the story that they are preparing for “martial law” in the event of a large natural disaster or national emergency?
What is it they know that we don’t? That is the “unasked question.” A prudent person might try to take in more details in order to answer that question for themselves. What else is going on out there that COULD add further clarity or resolution to the question of this gear-up for martial law?
Hurricane season is upon us, but most states in the wake of hurricanes have managed better than the Federal government to address our needs for such things…unless they “know” of a major storm coming, or that will be coming. There is sufficient evidence to lead one to believe our government, and others, may have ways to create these types of storms, according to the History Channel.
Or what about a nuclear weapon or even just an Electro Magnetic Pulse? This could be delivered by any number of countries now. But under what circumstances might this occur? There is one major threat that seems never to go completely away: Israel striking Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities. This is a grave threat indeed if Israel decides to do it. At the time they drop a bomb on Iran, the US is immediately at war with Russia and China. Hmmm…what significance does that have? Well, Russia already has been sending their submarines in close proximity to our East Coast. This hasn’t happened since the Cold War ended.
Why would this new administration, which does not appear to be friendly towards Israel, not just end the treaty with Israel? A good analyst might ask themselves, “What might this administration gain if they actually encouraged this behavior from Russia?”
Might this Russian presence be useful in some other way? It doesn’t seem as if we have done much about it. Let’s just suppose for a second that they WANTED the Russian subs to be there. What benefit might that be?
When taken into the context of the very strange, fast, massive shakedown of our treasury, one must wonder if there has been some threat hanging over the heads of folks in our own government (maybe as a way to keep the bureaucrats that wield more power and have no allegiance to any ONE president in line). Were some of these folks forced to go along with something they might not have wanted to? Could a minority of political folks, using outside assistance, have forced the rest of Washington into an agenda they would not have supported otherwise? Of course, it is helpful if they can get folks to BELIEVE they represent the majority. That would just require help from the media.
But what does it take to get a government to virtually self-destruct itself by printing and spending trillions of dollars so carelessly? Probably someone/some group that doesn’t much want the country to succeed. However, if they really only represented a minority of the folks, they would need some way to control their behavior; some big threat to keep them all too afraid to break free.
Remember those Russian nuclear subs? Not too long ago, we could not have imagined America accepting that scenario at all. But this administration has not made one peep about it? Why has nothing been said about them (or ANYTHING about ANY THREAT to our national security from outside forces)? Why is that? Could it be because this new administration IS the outside force. Because THEY are ALIGNED with the outside force?
Could those Russian subs be there to keep Congress towing the line? To keep our bureaucrats towing the line? To keep some in our military and law enforcement towing the line? Is this the strongarm that a “Government of the Media” would require in order to “enforce” their own policies?
So, what is possible from an administration that seems to have control of FEMA, DHS and other branches of “government” while working with foreign entities hostile to us? Well… virtually anything.
Are we under seige without realizing it? Our fore and aft may be compromised already. How would we know?
Do you finally get what this “martial law” is all about? It is not about a natural disaster or a natural emergency, but rather a well-orchestrated plan to take over America to the fullest extent possible. This is a “velvet” WAR. They are dismantling the Constitution, planning to take our guns, use bioweapons on us, use illegal aliens, gang members, unions, and other disgruntled parties against us.
While they have not called it that, it is what it surely is. There is no other way to explain how all these pieces fit together otherwise. Organize yourselves in your neighborhoods, town, cities, counties. Each area may see different threats, so we must do our best to prepare locally. The “endgame” is on. We don’t know how the picture could be any clearer.
Pray about it. Ask God for guidance, wisdom and insight. But see the handwriting on the wall. If you don’t, there is little help for you in the days, weeks and months ahead.
Supporting Document AFTER this article:
Israel’s timeline to strike Iran is rushed by the possibility the Russians have sold/will sell the Iranians a S-300, Missile Defense System. If the Iranians get this equipment, Israel will be UNABLE to take out Iranian nuclear capabilities in the future. See our assessment HERE
IAF Chief: We Must Stop S-300 Delivery, IsraelJPost.com, Sep 18, By Yaakov Katz
Israel needs to make every effort to stop the S-300 missile defense system from reaching countries where the air force may need to fly, IAF commander Maj.-Gen. Ido Nehushtan has told The Jerusalem Post in an exclusive interview.
“The S-300 is a Russian-made surface-to-air missile system that is very advanced, with long ranges and many capabilities,” Nehushtan told the Post in the interview, which appears in our Friday Magazine.
“We need to make every effort to stop this system from getting to places where the IAF needs to operate or may need to operate in the future,” he said.
The S-300 is one of the most advanced multi-target antiaircraft missile systems in the world and has a reported ability to track up to 100 targets simultaneously while engaging up to 12 at the same time. It has a range of about 200 km. and can hit targets at altitudes of 90,000 feet.
While Russia and Iran signed a deal for the sale of the system several years ago, according to latest assessments in Israel, it has yet to be delivered.
Last week, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu made a secret visit to Moscow for talks, which according to some news reports focused on the possible sale of the S-300 to Iran.
Earlier in the month, reports surfaced that the Mossad was involved in the interception of the missing Arctic Sea cargo ship in August. According to some versions, the ship was carrying S-300 missiles destined for Iran.
In the interview, Nehushtan offered a fierce defense of Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip in December 2008 and January 2009.
He defended Israel’s opening bombardment, including the attack on Hamas policemen, which the UN’s Richard Goldstone-led fact-finding mission this week branded a violation of international law.
“We need to look at Hamas from top to bottom,” Nehushtan said, in answer to a question about the legitimacy of targeting Hamas police forces. “Look at the way they [Hamas] killed Fatah. Who do you think did that? This is how they killed their own people. We need to disconnect from traditional military concepts and understand that Hamas doesn’t work that way. They don’t come in uniforms or in tanks to a battlefield.”
No other military in the world, Nehushtan said, was as careful as Israel’s when operating in a densely-populated urban setting.
“This was demonstrated by our accuracy as well as [by] the attention we gave to every single target, with exact planning to prevent collateral damage, even by calling the people there to let them leave their homes, which in some cases were storehouses for weapons,” the air force chief said. “We then kept our eye on the homes and ensured that they left. We gave this service and only then attacked.”
While vague in his answers on the Iranian threat, Nehushtan said Israel “retains the right to defend itself” and that “ultimately, the job of the IAF is to provide security for the State of Israel and we know how to do this.”
Israel, he said, preferred that the Iranian issue be handled by the international community. “We would be happy if these efforts are successful,” he said.
The sense of urgency regarding the S-300 was mentioned earlier this week in a report on the Iranian threat published by the Bipartisan Policy Center and called “Meeting the Challenge – Time is Running Out.”
Authored by two former US senators and the former deputy head of the US Military European Command – whose geographic area of responsibility includes Israel – the report warned that Israel might attack in one of two scenarios.
“Should we [the US] fail to act decisively to curtail Iran’s nuclear program in the near-term, or if it appears likely that Iran is about to obtain game-changing military technology – such as Russia’s S-300 anti-aircraft system – Israel, more likely than not, will act on its own,” the authors wrote.
Free People – It seems as though the Russians and our ‘president’ are working together to squeeze Israel into a timeframe of sooner rather than later.
Last week, we posted an article titled, “The Unasked Question–Russia’s Role” and looking at the evidence from a trained analysts’-style perspective, we concluded ‘president Obama’ either wants Israel to strike Iran or is using this threat, plus the Russian subs off the East Coast as a threat to those in Washington to push through the HealthScare Bill or they will pull the trigger.
Today the Wall Street Journal dances their way around some of the same issues. What is their conclusion?
Thus, unlike Israel’s air strike against Iraq’s reactor in 1981 or Syria’s in 2007, both of which were planned in the utmost secrecy, the Israelis have gone out of their way to advertise their fears, purposes and capabilities. They have sent warships through the Suez Canal in broad daylight and conducted widely publicized air-combat exercises at long range. They have also been unusually forthcoming in their briefings with reporters, expressing confidence at every turn that Israel can get the job done.
The problem, however, is that the administration isn’t taking the bait, and one has to wonder why. Perhaps it thinks its diplomacy will work, or that it has the luxury of time, or that it can talk the Israelis out of attacking. Alternatively, it might actually want Israel to attack without inviting the perception that it has colluded with it. Or maybe it isn’t really paying attention.
But Israel is paying attention. And the longer the U.S. delays playing hardball with Iran, the sooner Israel is likely to strike. A report published today by the Bipartisan Policy Center, and signed by Democrat Chuck Robb, Republican Dan Coats, and retired Gen. Charles Ward, notes that by next year Iran will “be able to produce a weapon’s worth of highly enriched uranium . . . in less than two months.” No less critical in determining Israel’s timetable is the anticipated delivery to Iran of Russian S-300 anti-aircraft batteries: Israel will almost certainly strike before those deliveries are made, no matter whether an Iranian bomb is two months or two years away.
Such a strike may well be in Israel’s best interests, though that depends entirely on whether the strike succeeds. It is certainly in America’s supreme interest that Iran not acquire a genuine nuclear capability, whether of the actual or break-out variety. That goes also for the Middle East generally, which doesn’t need the nuclear arms race an Iranian capability would inevitably provoke.
Then again, it is not in the U.S. interest that Israel be the instrument of Iran’s disarmament. For starters, its ability to do so is iffy: Israeli strategists are quietly putting it about that even a successful attack may have to be repeated a few years down the road as Iran reconstitutes its capacity. For another thing, Iran could respond to such a strike not only against Israel itself, but also U.S targets in Iraq and the Persian Gulf.
But most importantly, it is an abdication of a superpower’s responsibility to outsource matters of war and peace to another state, however closely allied. President Obama has now ceded the driver’s seat on Iran policy to Prime Minister Netanyahu. He would do better to take the wheel again, keeping in mind that Iran is beyond the reach of his eloquence, and keeping in mind, too, that very useful Roman adage, Si vis pacem, para bellum. [If you wish for peace, prepare for war.]
What should we make of this article? Well, the global elites have had WWIII on their planning board since Albert Pike drafted all three WWs. Bible prophecy points to this as the end times, Muslims are waiting for it as well. So, as we were suggesting in our own article, it would seem we have a ‘president’ not on the side of the American people and fully ready to threaten us with nuclear weapons if we don’t concede to his (and his masters) demands. But this is as close as a mainstream media outlet can get to saying what we have said. Thank God that liberty is still alive and well even IF out of the mainstream!!